Reports from Heckerling 2017 - The Executor’s Job Gets Tougher: Basis Consistency and Selected Other Income Tax Issues Facing Executors
- Jan 18, 2017
Continuing with our reports from the 2017 Heckerling Institute on Estate Planning
Steve Akers (Bessemer Trust Company) discussed the new basis consistency and information reporting rules that are now being imposed on executors. They apply to property reported on estate tax returns filed after July 31, 2015.
These new rules are as follows:
- Basis Consistency Rule: The basis of inherited property shall not exceed its estate tax value (subject to normal post-death basis adjustments). However, this rule only applies to property that increased the decedent’s estate tax liability; therefore, it does not apply to property eligible for the marital or charitable estate tax deduction. Furthermore, a harsh rule applies to any property discovered after the estate tax return is filed or that is otherwise omitted from that return: such property receives a zero basis unless it is reported on a supplemental estate tax return that is filed before the statute of limitations expires.
- Information Reporting Rule: When an estate tax return must be filed because the decedent’s gross estate plus adjusted taxable gifts exceed the basic exclusion amount in effect at the decedent’s death, the executor must also file Form 8971 and Schedule(s) A with the IRS reporting the estate tax value of the property in the decedent’s estate as well as provide Schedule(s) A to the potential beneficiaries showing what they received or could receive from the estate. Property not required to be reported includes the following (i) cash, (ii) income in respect of a decedent, (iii) tangible personal property not exceeding $3,000 in value, and (iv)property sold before the information reports are due. This reporting rule applies to property eligible for the marital or charitable deduction even though such property is not subject to the basis consistency rule. Form 8971 with attachments must be filed with the IRS and the Schedule(s) A of Form 8971 provided to the respective beneficiaries 30 days after the earlier of the due date of the estate tax return (including filing extensions) or the date the return is filed. However, if the estate tax return is not timely filed, the deadline is extended to 30 days after the actual filing date. Estates filing solely to elect portability are not subject to either the basis consistency or information reporting rules.
Penalties for not complying with these rules can be steep. If a taxpayer reports a higher basis than the estate tax value, he will be subject to the accuracy-related penalties on underpayments. Furthermore, the penalty if an executor fails to comply with the information reporting rules is generally $260 per failure, with a maximum penalty of $3,193,000 per year. The penalty is generally lowered to $50 per failure, with a maximum penalty of $532,000 per year if the information reporting rules are met within 30 days of the due date.
For more content stemming from the 2017 Heckerling Institute on Estate Planning, please click here.
EisnerAmper Trends & Developments - March/April 2017
- Estate Planning: News from the Heckerling Institute on Estate Planning...
- Highlights from Recent Developments 2016
- Retirement Accounts in First and Second Marriages: The Fun Begins
- The Executor's Job Gets Tougher: Basis Consistency and Selected Other Income Tax Issues Facing Executors
- Recent International Developments
- Portability: Lots of Questions, Few Easy Answers
- Managing Inherited Art and Encouraging Clients to Plan Ahead
- Intellectual Property Protection: The Evolving World of 3D Printing and Intellectual Property
- Will Autonomous Cars Sideswipe the Insurance Industry?
- Immigration and Investment: The Changing World of the EB-5 Program
- Tax Savings for Start-Ups and Small Businesses - Part 1: R&D Credit Can Now Offset Payroll Tax
- Tax Savings for Start-Ups and Small Businesses - Part 2: R&D Credit Can Now Offset AMT
What's on Your Mind?
Karen L. Goldberg
Karen L. Goldberg Partner-in-Charge of the National Tax Trusts and Estates practice, within the Private Client Services Group. She specializes in estate planning for closely held business owners, senior corporate executives and other high net worth individuals.
Start a conversation with Karen
Explore More Insights
DOT Weighs in on Budget; Two Proposals Relate to Nonoperating Foundations and Payout RulesRead More
On-Demand: Annual Trust & Estate Update | Planning in an Evolving Economic EnvironmentRead More
Receive the latest business insights, analysis, and perspectives from EisnerAmper professionals.