What Tax Considerations Does My IPO Trigger?

March 09, 2022

By Michael Grant

Is your company preparing for (or have you recently had) an IPO? In this video, you’ll learn about the impact that an ownership change under IRC Sec. 382 can have on the utilization of net operating loss (NOL) carryovers and other factors that can influence your tax burden.


 

In This Issue:


Transcript

Michael Grant:Hello, my name is Michael Grant and I'm a director at Eisner Advisory Group. I've been with the firm for over 15 years, and one of my specialties is IRC 382 studies.

One of the more common questions I get asked from our tech and life science clients is a company's planning or just had an initial public offering, what impact does that have on our net operating loss carryovers?

My first response to them is always to ask them if they've ever had or performed a 382 study. Under Internal Revenue Code Section 382, the ability of a loss corporation to utilize their historical NOL carryovers and other tax attributes, such as R&D credits, could be limited it if the corporation undergoes a accumulative ownership change of greater than 50%.

A common misunderstanding is that the 50% change has to occur in one transaction or be held by one shareholder. In actuality, the 50% threshold is cumulative and is calculated over a three year rolling period by analyzing the various 5% shareholders of the company.

Because of the cumulative nature of the calculation one of the common causes of an ownership change is an IPO. In a situation where an IPO does trigger a change under IRC 382 all of the loss corporations historical NOL carryovers and credits could be limited on how they can be used going forward. I always like to paint the picture of these carryovers being thrown in jail, and each subsequent year an amount comes out of jail and becomes available for use. This annual amount is referred to as the annual limitation and is calculated at the time of the ownership change.

The annual limit is calculated as the value of the loss company immediately before the ownership change, and that is multiplied by the highest long term tax exempt rate for the three month period ending with the month of change. The current rate is around 1.4%, so for illustrative purposes if we have a life science company value at a hundred million dollars the resulting annual limitation would be $1.4 million. This means that each year after the ownership change $1.4 million of the trapped NOLs would become available for use.

Since the driving factor behind the limitation is the value of the company there could be situations where NOLs would be lost forever without the ability to be utilized. Having a 382 study in place leading up to or immediately after an IPO can save significant time and cost. The longer client's wait to have a study performed the more challenges that could arise. Historical record keeping can be lax and more difficult to piece together. The backbone of these calculations are the historical records so if those are not accurate or have been lost over time then the accuracy of the calculations will be compromised.

Knowing the impact of an ownership change under IRC 382 is important for a number of reasons, including the utilization of the NOLs, deferred tax asset reporting, and planning for the preservation of the NOL carryovers.

Once an initial study has been performed the template can be used as a planning tool for future capital raises to manage and preserve the NOLs. There would be no worse situation than having taxable income and thinking that you have enough NOLs to cover the tax burden, only to find out that an ownership change was triggered and the NOLs are actually not available.

Hopefully I was able to give you a basic understanding of how IRC 382 could impact your IPO and tax planning moving forward. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.

 

About Michael Grant

Mr. Grant is a Tax Director specializing in corporate and individual income taxation, and Section 382. He serves companies in various industries including manufacturing, retail, real estate and life sciences.


More in This Series

Competitive Compensation Packages for Startups

Though often strapped for cash, startups are finding new and creative ways to remain competitive. In this video, you’ll find out about alternative compensation considerations and strategies as we explore ways to engage and retain key stakeholders in ever-changing markets.

Startups: Tax Implications of Hiring Independent Contractors vs. Employees

In this video, you’ll learn about the three worker classification tests, filing requirements, and more in order to make an accurate worker classification/determination and avoid possible tax and legal exposure.

Cybersecurity Risks and Solutions for Life Sciences Startups

Cybersecurity poses a significant risk to life sciences startups that handle personal identifiable information. In this video, you’ll learn about the risks facing your business and how you can protect your clients and systems.

When Do I Need to Get an IRC Sec. 409A Valuation for My Stock Options or Stock Grants?

A 409A valuation is used by private companies to assess the fair market value of their stock. In this video, you’ll learn when a 409A valuation is necessary, the length of time in which it is valid, and which events trigger the need for an update

Capital Raising: What Are My Options—and How Do I Approach Investors?

In this video, you’ll learn about various options for raising capital, tips for creating your potential investor list, and how to approach investors.

What Technology and Life Sciences Companies Need to Know about being Acquired by a SPAC

Becoming a public company through an acquisition by a SPAC is an alternative to the traditional initial public offering (IPO). In this video, you’ll learn some key considerations that a technology or life sciences company should keep in mind before being acquired by a SPAC.

Going Global: How to Report Your Foreign Operations for Tax Purposes

In this video, we’ll examine why reporting on foreign operations for tax purposes is an important matter for technology and life sciences start-ups doing business abroad.

Medical Device Companies: Consideration for Consignment Inventory and Related Sales Process

Many medical device companies have chosen to deploy a consignment inventory and sales approach for their related products. In this video, you’ll learn about the advantages and disadvantages of this strategy for both the company and third parties, as well as best practices to consider

What Technology and Life Sciences Companies Need to Know About Transfer Pricing—from Start-ups to Large MNEs

In this video, you will learn why transfer pricing is an important focus point for many multinational enterprises in the technology and life science industry.

Capital Raising: Are Financial Instruments Classified as Liabilities or Equity?

In this video, you'll learn about the different accounting ramifications for financial instruments issued to investors by start-ups and why it’s important to properly structure financial instruments upfront for accounting purposes.

Financing for Entrepreneurs: What Are Issuance Costs?

In this video, you’ll learn about “issuance costs” and how to properly account for them based on the type of funding that was raised.

Does My Start-up Need an Advisory Board?

In this video, you'll examine the ways how an advisory board differs from a board of directors; why you might consider forming an advisory board; how you can attract and retain advisory board members; and how you can enhance the effectiveness of the advisory board for your start-up.

What Technology and Life Sciences Companies Need to Know About SOC 1 Reports

Brenda DeSaro explains what a SOC 1 Report is, discusses why companies need to be concerned about these reports even though they likely outsource this work to third-party providers, and outlines a best practices approach.

Entrepreneurship: Behind the Numbers

John Pennett talks about the ingredients for successful entrepreneurship—from early to late-stage enterprises—with “Behind the Numbers” host and senior director at CFGI.