Outsourcing Trends in the Alternative Asset Industry from an Institutional Investor Perspective

October 13, 2015

By Elana Margulies

Over the last few years, the alternative investment industry has seen a shift toward fund managers outsourcing some of their operations components due to investor demand, regulatory requirements, among other objectives. At the EisnerAmper and Blue River Partners inaugural Alternative Investments Forum: Dallas, which took place September 30 at the highly distinguished Crescent Club, a quartet of panelists shared their perspective on the latest trends and what the future holds with respect to third parties handling non-investment components.  

The panelists included:

  • Greg Ciaverelli, Partner, Chief Operating Officer, Private Advisors
  • Jeffry Haber, Controller, Commonwealth Fund
  • Alkesh Gianchandari, Institutional Sales – Director Global Client Group, Deutsche Bank Asset Wealth Management
  • Michael “Mickey” Minces, Co-Founder & General Counsel, Blue River Partners

The interactive discussion was moderated by Stephen Mazzotti, Partner, EisnerAmper.

Here were a few key themes discussed:

  • After informally polling the audience, the majority of attendees said they outsourced some of their operational components and the panelists concurred that this is a trend that will continue going forward.
  • While the majority of alternative investment managers have outsourced and are expected to continue outsourcing their accounting, administration, and legal functions, deemed the most common facets; on another level, the industry has seen both hedge funds and private equity firms appoint third-party service providers for other components.
    1) Structuring/Marketing/Distribution: Managers who solely want to focus on trading their portfolio have turned to Wall Street investment banks to assist them with structuring their fund contingent upon investor preference to create a Limited Partnership vehicle or Separately Managed Account, to name a couple of options. And further, the investment bank has helped them distribute it to allocators. Additionally, with the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD) causing U.S. managers to have a more challenging time marketing to Europe, these investment banks have helped them create an AIFMD-compliant structure to raise money from allocators on that continent.
    2) Compliance: With heightened regulatory requirements, many managers continue to outsource some compliance functions when they don’t have the resources in-house to handle them. However, the ongoing debate continues whether firms have a dedicated chief compliance officer (CCO) or if they do not have a CCO, have a chief operating officer (COO) and/or chief financial officer (CFO) who also wears multiple hats and acts as CCO.
    3) Information Technology: Further, with more attention regarding cybersecurity threats, managers are expected to continue outsourcing their IT capabilities.
    4) Valuations/Risk Reporting: Alternative investment managers will continue to outsource their valuations work and risk reporting to third-party providers given it demonstrates independence. However, it is important that firms have someone in-house to double check the work of the outside provider. 
About Elana Margulies-Snyderman

Elana Margulies-Snyderman is an investment industry reporter and writer who develops articles, opinion pieces and original research designed to help illuminate the most challenging issues confronting fund managers and executives.

Primary Contacts