|
These two helpful tools can work together to tell you where and why your practice might be lagging financially:
1. Gap analysis - Using this tool, you can identify key areas of underperformance, highlighting the relative contribution of various factors. Utilizing widely used measures (Encounters Per Hour, No-Show Rate, Gross Charges, etc.), compare your practice’s performance against appropriate benchmarks (national, regional, by specialty, etc.). The difference between your performance measures and the benchmark is the “gap.”
For example, analysis of your revenue cycle may show a substantial gap between your collections and those of better-performing practices in the same specialty. Through this analysis, you can identify opportunities for improving operational and revenue cycle workflow, and put a plan for improvement into action.
2. Root cause analysis - This tool tells you why your practice performance measures are lagging - whether it’s patient safety or net income per Full Time Equivalent (FTE) physician. Here, you break down the performance issues uncovered in the gap analysis into components that can each be benchmarked in turn.
For instance, further analysis of a revenue gap may point to inaccurate coding as a contributing factor. Digging deeper, you may uncover multiple additional factors, creating a tree diagram of errors. For example, you might find that coding staff lacks sufficient clinical knowledge to code to the highest level. Further, a provider may be providing ambiguous or nonspecific documentation. At the administrative level, lack of a standardized HIM workflow model may be compounding these errors.
|